Submission Deadline: March 1, 2026, Midnight EST

Purpose of Review Papers

Review papers are designed to update the membership on emerging, evolving, or controversial topics in equine veterinary medicine. These papers do not require  original research data but should demonstrate substantial clinical experience or subject matter expertise.

Review papers may:
- Synthesize and clarify current literature
- Highlight evolving consensus or disagreements in practice
- Identify areas in need of further research or clarification

The presenter is expected to have significant experience in the topic area.

Presentation Format

Review paper presentations are limited to 15 minutes, plus 5 minutes for Q&A.
- Manuscripts must be at least 600 words; there is no upper word limit.
- Format must follow the General Guidelines for submission.

Required Section Headings

The paper should be organized under the following headings. Subheadings may be used to enhance readability and logical flow:

Paper Title
* The title should begin with “Review of” and clearly identify the subject matter.
* Use title case, avoid punctuation and full-sentence phrasing.
- Good: Review of Diagnostic Imaging for Equine Stifle Injuries
- Not Ideal: This paper reviews different ways to image stifle injuries in horses

Take-Home Message
* A brief summary (1–3 sentences, ~50 words) that conveys the most relevant conclusion or clinical message.
* Should clearly express practical application for the equine practitioner.
* Take-Home Message Example:
There are multiple upper respiratory conditions that impact performance during high-speed exercise. Differentiating between these allows for targeted treatment and improved outcomes.

Introduction
* Define the subject matter and its clinical importance.
* Explain the need for a review and state the paper’s objective or scope.
* The last sentence should typically state the objective or intent of the review.

Review of Topic/Information
* Summarize key published literature relevant to the topic.
* Identify areas of agreement, conflict, or controversy.
* Discuss the strengths and limitations of available data.
* Subheadings may be used to organize complex topics.

Attribute viewpoints appropriately and cite supporting authors.

Discussion
* Offer interpretation of the reviewed material and its implications for clinical practice.
* Include the author’s perspective when appropriate, especially if it differs from previously published opinions.
* Conclude with a clear summary that synthesizes the key takeaways from the review.

Acknowledgments
* i. Declaration of Ethics
* ii. Conflicts of Interest
* iii. Funding/Material/Technical Support
(Refer to General Guidelines for complete formatting and disclosure requirements.)

References
* Follow Vancouver style, per JAVMA standards.
* Number references in-text using superscripts in the order of appearance.
* See General Guidelines for detailed formatting requirements.
* Authors are responsible for ensuring formatting and accuracy of all citations.

For help with reference formatting please google “Vancouver citation tutorial” or check this link with a roughly 3-minute video: Bing Videos.

Blinded Review Policy

To ensure an unbiased review process, all submitted papers must be blinded. See General Guidelines for detailed blinding requirements. Submissions will be reviewed  by a blinded team from the Scientific Review & Editorial Committee (SREC) for relevance, clarity, and value to equine practitioners.